
Float
Gesamtbewertung
Filtern nach
Untern. Größe
1571 Bewertungen

- Branche: Computer-Software
- Unternehmensgröße: 51–200 Mitarbeiter
- Täglich für 6-12 Monate genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Gesamtbewertung
- Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
- Bedienkomfort
- Weiterempfehlungsquote 8.0 /10
Beautifully simple and easy to use
Bewertet am 26.1.2019
Float is a product I like using, and I wish some of its features and UX elements were in the other...
Float is a product I like using, and I wish some of its features and UX elements were in the other software that I use! We use Synergist for job and project management, but Float for scheduling because it UX is so much better than Synergist's scheduler tool.
Vorteile
Float's user interface and logic are inspirational. They have made the activity of coordinating multiple resources on multiple projects about as easy as it can be. They have paid a lot of attention to usability, efficient use of screen real estate and simple navigation. However the killer feature is the intuitive yet clever way that searching and data navigation work. All searching and filtering is done using a single search field, which offers indexed word search on pretty much everything including tags. There is also a well-worked out protocol for handling union and intersect searches.
Nachteile
The only real bugbear is that any user that can enter data into the system can define new values for any field. It isn't possible to centrally control lists such as task names, clients, job descriptions etc. This means that if you have more than one person using the system, very quickly you get different versions of the same thing being defined (e.g. job roles being slightly different) which makes it difficult to analyse across records. Not a dealbreaker, but I do think it should be possible to lock down lists of values. Also it would be good if you could zoom out the view a little more - if you're dealing with more than a dozen resources/projects.
- Branche: Unternehmensberatung
- Unternehmensgröße: 51–200 Mitarbeiter
- Täglich für Mehr als 1 Jahr genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Gesamtbewertung
- Bedienkomfort
- Weiterempfehlungsquote 9.0 /10
Great for
Bewertet am 31.8.2023
Vorteile
How visual and easy it makes talent scheduling for our client services business! It's really intuitive in terms of its UX/UI and means that the information is shareable and understandable by everyone. It's actually created positive reliance for the business where it's become the single source of truth about who is working on which project/ away on hols and for how long, so that teams can effectively plan the best use of people. Especially as we work on multiple projects under the same client account, the tags are super useful as while we might be working for Client X, project A and project C might have completely different briefs and people scheduled on them to complete.
Nachteile
Probably some of the toggling features when you try to filter people across multiple departments.. It's not a massive issue, but one I am struggling to nail.
- Branche: Marketing & Werbung
- Unternehmensgröße: 11–50 Mitarbeiter
- Wöchentlich für 6-12 Monate genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Gesamtbewertung
- Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
- Bedienkomfort
- Kundenbetreuung
- Weiterempfehlungsquote 6.0 /10
Feels overly complicated
Bewertet am 31.8.2023
Vorteile
I enjoy the ease to add and archive employees
Nachteile
I feel like it is overly-complicated and difficult to spread hours across resources / projects, and the reporting it confusing. It also doesn't allow you to add pass thru costs to a project seamlessly.
In Betracht gezogene Alternativen
ForecastWarum Float gewählt wurde
Company decision / costZuvor genutzte Software
ScreendragonGründe für den Wechsel zu Float
Unclear.- Branche: Öffentlichkeitsarbeit und Kommunikation
- Unternehmensgröße: 1 001–5 000 Mitarbeiter
- Täglich für 6-12 Monate genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Gesamtbewertung
- Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
- Bedienkomfort
- Weiterempfehlungsquote 9.0 /10
Makes capacity juggling so much easier
Bewertet am 22.8.2023
Vorteile
The tool has a simple overview, visually similar to already known calendars. This means that you don't need any time to familiarize yourself with it. Just click and add entries.If you work with many different customers, you can create them once and then easily add individual projects within these customer folders.I especially like the fact that I can tell my clients apart right at first glance using the Color Coding feature. But when I need more information, I can also click on the entries and have access to the job number, the available budget, and any other information that might be available.Thanks Float - you make my daily work so much easier :-)
Nachteile
What could be improved:Currently, when I enter vacation, my projects in the same time frame just disappear from the schedule. This is quite inconvenient and should be fixed. It would be more practical to at least be warned and transfer the projects individually to someone else from the team, or be able to specify vacation substitutions so that the projects are automatically transferred.Also, it would be great if you could duplicate blockers via copy & paste. The split tool is often a bit impractical to use.
- Branche: Tiefbau
- Unternehmensgröße: 5 001–10 000 Mitarbeiter
- Wöchentlich für Mehr als 2 Jahre genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Gesamtbewertung
- Bedienkomfort
- Kundenbetreuung
- Weiterempfehlungsquote 8.0 /10
Positive resource management tool
Bewertet am 28.8.2023
Vorteile
Easy to use and share across different users
Nachteile
Adding more people to the team difficult or limited licensestracking budget adding leave and leave alternatives
- Branche: Informationstechnologie & -dienste
- Unternehmensgröße: 501–1 000 Mitarbeiter
- Täglich für Mehr als 1 Jahr genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Gesamtbewertung
- Bedienkomfort
- Kundenbetreuung
- Weiterempfehlungsquote 7.0 /10
Daily Float User
Bewertet am 1.9.2023
Vorteile
My whole team can access it, and really helps drive who is on what piece of billable work.
Nachteile
Gets hard to manage lots of small projects and tasks, the view gets crowded and hard to read. Reporting is straight forward either, its hard to understand initially what they show
- Branche: Informationstechnologie & -dienste
- Unternehmensgröße: 51–200 Mitarbeiter
- Wöchentlich für Mehr als 1 Jahr genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Gesamtbewertung
- Bedienkomfort
- Kundenbetreuung
- Weiterempfehlungsquote 9.0 /10
Easy to use and learn
Bewertet am 30.8.2023
Vorteile
Float has been designed well to have a intuitive user interface which is easy it to pick up and learn. Additionally, it promotes a balance between home life and work life as time recording encourages me to to identify signs of overworking. Overall it helps create a healthier and happier work life.
Nachteile
Time recording in general is burdensome or very administrative. I try to record my time at the end of each week as a habit but I tend to forget. I also receive several promotion emails from Float which is a bit annoying.
- Branche: Design
- Unternehmensgröße: 201–500 Mitarbeiter
- Täglich für 6-12 Monate genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Gesamtbewertung
- Bedienkomfort
- Weiterempfehlungsquote 10.0 /10
Easy and intuitive interface
Bewertet am 23.8.2023
Overall it's great, just a bug/inconvenience with the cursor as mentioned. There should be a way to...
Overall it's great, just a bug/inconvenience with the cursor as mentioned. There should be a way to 'clear' the function after using it.
Vorteile
I like how simple and easy it is to use, makes doing timesheets a breeze!
Nachteile
My cursor gets stuck after I add/delete/split. I have to refresh the page to get back to normal cursor mode.
- Branche: Computer- & Netzwerksicherheit
- Unternehmensgröße: 2–10 Mitarbeiter
- Täglich für 6-12 Monate genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Gesamtbewertung
- Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
- Bedienkomfort
- Kundenbetreuung
- Weiterempfehlungsquote 8.0 /10
Great for capacity management
Bewertet am 24.8.2023
Vorteile
Super useful for planning and capacity resource prediction and management across multiple projects and clients!
Nachteile
The integrations with Trello and Xero Projects leave a lot to be desired to be honest - there is no way to link existing Float projects to projects in these services
- Branche: Buchhaltung
- Unternehmensgröße: 11–50 Mitarbeiter
- Täglich für 6-12 Monate genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Gesamtbewertung
- Bedienkomfort
- Weiterempfehlungsquote 10.0 /10
Makes planning ahead and setting daily tasks so easy
Bewertet am 31.8.2023
We use it daily in the office, it's easy to extend, move, or delete tasks. Anyone can use it, we...
We use it daily in the office, it's easy to extend, move, or delete tasks. Anyone can use it, we plan a month ahead with it
Vorteile
I like how easy it is to use and all the customization
Nachteile
Can't think of any downsides! It's a great software for the workplace
- Branche: Computer-Software
- Unternehmensgröße: 51–200 Mitarbeiter
- Täglich für 6-12 Monate genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Gesamtbewertung
- Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
- Bedienkomfort
- Kundenbetreuung
- Weiterempfehlungsquote 8.0 /10
Development company taking next steps in project management
Bewertet am 14.8.2020
A very positive experience allowing the company I work for to get better more accurate project...
A very positive experience allowing the company I work for to get better more accurate project plans and financial reports.
Vorteile
The ease of use as a one stop shop, browser based to allow all the development team (and subsiduary but linked teams) to see important dates like dev complete, bug fix windows, cert windows and release dates.
The ability to quickly block out time for features and projects.
The ability to add notes and details to tasks.
Fully fleshed out holiday and time off structure.
Robust financial reports possible with very high degree of accuracy for budget per project, per quarter, per annum.
We used to get by with using Excel, we invested in Float and it has taken the companies' project planning to the next step. I would recommend Float for small to mid sized companies definitely, it is a great product boost and good way of reporting and seeing issues early.
Nachteile
it does not allow you to easily move a bunch of small tasks along in the timeline, that's my only main gripe, you can't band box select you have to shift select. Everything else is intuitive and easy.
In Betracht gezogene Alternativen
monday.comWarum Float gewählt wurde
Excel was clunky and out schedule was increasing in ambition and scope.Zuvor genutzte Software
Microsoft ExcelGründe für den Wechsel zu Float
the website and videos showing features were clear and clean and one of my peers had previous experience and good reviews of the product and we were given a gratis time period to try things out, this helped us alot in making sure Float was the product for us.- Branche: Freizeit, Reisen & Tourismus
- Unternehmensgröße: 5 001–10 000 Mitarbeiter
- Täglich für 6-12 Monate genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Gesamtbewertung
- Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
- Bedienkomfort
- Kundenbetreuung
- Weiterempfehlungsquote 9.0 /10
So Glad I Found this Software!
Bewertet am 5.8.2019
Overall, it has been a value add to the way we do things. We were using Google Sheets to schedule...
Overall, it has been a value add to the way we do things. We were using Google Sheets to schedule and calculate bandwidth before and the limitations were severe. I'm thrilled that we now have an easier and more attractive way to plan work!
Vorteile
I like the ease of use for bandwidth calculation. Before Float, it would be very difficult for us to understand Trainer occupancy, and it was also a challenge to schedule trainings far in advance over several regions. With Float, I can see what's coming up at a glance and provide accurate reports to stakeholders so that they know how busy we are and will be. At the end of the quarter, I can easily calculate and show how much time we spent, and on what.
Nachteile
For my specific use, access can be a challenge. I need something between "Project Manager" and "Member." For me, it would be ideal if there are a "Department Manager" role where people who had this level of access could modify the schedule for anyone in their department, but not see or edit the schedule of other departments.
- Branche: Computer-Software
- Unternehmensgröße: 5 001–10 000 Mitarbeiter
- Täglich für Mehr als 2 Jahre genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Gesamtbewertung
- Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
- Bedienkomfort
- Kundenbetreuung
- Weiterempfehlungsquote 8.0 /10
Float is your management tool for a good business.
Bewertet am 3.3.2023
Monthly cost is very low, services are great, support is wonderful, interface is a wow.
Monthly cost is very low, services are great, support is wonderful, interface is a wow.
Vorteile
Sync. of Float with other calendars such as Outlook and google makes life easier to work. All the reminders sent are great.
Nachteile
Could not find anything wrong with this software.
In Betracht gezogene Alternativen
monday.comWarum Float gewählt wurde
Found more options in Float, it exactly has what our company needs.Zuvor genutzte Software
ZenHRGründe für den Wechsel zu Float
After analyzing how it works we found that it does not contain all the features we are looking for.- Branche: Marketing & Werbung
- Unternehmensgröße: 2–10 Mitarbeiter
- Täglich für Mehr als 1 Jahr genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Gesamtbewertung
- Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
- Bedienkomfort
- Kundenbetreuung
- Weiterempfehlungsquote 10.0 /10
Solid Product
Bewertet am 27.6.2022
It's helped us grow a lot and help more people. It's really helped us spend less time doing admin...
It's helped us grow a lot and help more people. It's really helped us spend less time doing admin work and more time doing real work and helping people. It takes some getting used to and commitment but it's beautifully designed, intuitive, and a big part of our success.
Vorteile
How easy it is to use. It's easy to jump in and also complicated enough that you can really use some advanced features.
Nachteile
There are of course small issues here and there but none worth mentioning at all. It's truly a great product and really helpful.
Antwort von Float
Thank you for your review, Adam! Excellent to hear that Float is saving you time on admin work so you can do more of what you do best!
- Branche: Informationstechnologie & -dienste
- Unternehmensgröße: 11–50 Mitarbeiter
- Täglich für 6-12 Monate genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Gesamtbewertung
- Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
- Bedienkomfort
- Kundenbetreuung
- Weiterempfehlungsquote 10.0 /10
Simple and powerful resource management tool to manage team workload
Bewertet am 5.8.2020
We really love Float and it’s been a game changer in effectively managing our resources across...
We really love Float and it’s been a game changer in effectively managing our resources across projects. We now have a clear view on our resource pipeline and it’s allowed project managers to better utilise team based on availability and make more informed hiring decisions.
Vorteile
Easy to setup and use without any training required. Clean interface that makes it easy to view and update resources assigned to projects. Love the ability to easily drag to extend duration of tasks assigned.
Nachteile
Would be great if there was a better integration with our timesheet tool (Xero) to populate timesheets automatically based on plan in Float.
Antwort von Float
Hi Ben,
Thanks for your review! I've passed your Xero integration request to our team.
I also wanted to let you know that we do have a time tracking add-on in Float that pre-fills your team's timesheets based on the work schedule. You can find out how it works here, https://www.float.com/how-it-works/time-tracking.
All Float users can try time tracking free for 30 days. The Account Owner needs to activate this from the Team Settings in Float.
If you want a demo of how it works, or have any questions, please feel free to email us at [email protected].
Thanks again for the review!
Cheers,
Siobhan
- Branche: Informationstechnologie & -dienste
- Unternehmensgröße: 51–200 Mitarbeiter
- Täglich für Mehr als 2 Jahre genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Gesamtbewertung
- Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
- Bedienkomfort
- Kundenbetreuung
- Weiterempfehlungsquote 8.0 /10
Float review from a project manager perspective
Bewertet am 15.6.2022
Float has solved issues regarding time allocation and prioritization for me, which is what I really...
Float has solved issues regarding time allocation and prioritization for me, which is what I really expect from this software.
Vorteile
I use float to quickly see my and my team's schedule for the day. It gives me an oversight into the entire day's work in a couple of minutes. This is what I like about float
Nachteile
Logging in time used versus time scheduled can be a bit more streamlined as right now it's a bit difficult to track unless everyone adds in their time log correctly.
- Branche: Design
- Unternehmensgröße: 2–10 Mitarbeiter
- Täglich für 6-12 Monate genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Gesamtbewertung
- Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
- Bedienkomfort
- Kundenbetreuung
- Weiterempfehlungsquote 7.0 /10
Great tool!
Bewertet am 15.6.2022
Overall we love to use float. We especially like the time logging features.
Overall we love to use float. We especially like the time logging features.
Vorteile
The interface has a great overview. Adding projects and tasks is intuitive and the colours make every tasks and project stand out. Logging time is really easy. We were not interested in a "log-per-minute" type of application but rather one where you can just log bigger blocks. Float helped us plan and log our time better.
Nachteile
Planning a project is not super extensive. Float has some tools but the tools are a bit limited. The time tracking feature is the feature we use the most, it is a shame that is not available separately.
Antwort von Float
Thanks for your review, Martijn! Excellent that Float is helping you plan and track your time better. We have some exciting new time tracking features coming soon, stay tuned!
- Branche: Computer-Software
- Unternehmensgröße: 11–50 Mitarbeiter
- Täglich für 1-5 Monate genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Gesamtbewertung
- Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
- Bedienkomfort
- Kundenbetreuung
- Weiterempfehlungsquote 10.0 /10
Easy to use
Bewertet am 6.2.2020
I have a team spread around the globe and this really highlights what work and projects are being...
I have a team spread around the globe and this really highlights what work and projects are being carried out by the team and provides a good forecast of where resource shortfalls are.
Vorteile
The software is easy to use and has many features that support resource planning in flexible ways.
Nachteile
There could be some work on the global settings where we can convert from a local currency (i.e. Euros, Pounds, Aussie dollars) into a default currency to see how projects compare with each other when normalised.
Warum Float gewählt wurde
More flexible, more features and somehow cheaperGründe für den Wechsel zu Float
They solved the issue I was struggling with which is a team view and resource capacity planning. The other products were either to complex or did not have the features I desired.- Branche: Computer-Software
- Unternehmensgröße: 11–50 Mitarbeiter
- Täglich für Mehr als 1 Jahr genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Gesamtbewertung
- Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
- Bedienkomfort
- Kundenbetreuung
- Weiterempfehlungsquote 10.0 /10
Best Scheduling Tool on the market
Bewertet am 24.8.2020
It's fantastic to use :)
It's fantastic to use :)
Vorteile
So I hardly ever write Reviews, and even less on software - but Float is an exception.
This tool really change the way our Agency works, especially in times of 100% home-office.
It's amazingly simple to use, has a great overview of your team's schedule, and makes forecasting and reporting extremely easy.
I'd give this tool 12 points if I could!
Nachteile
There are a few minor glitches - but the customer service team including the devs are very helpful!
In Betracht gezogene Alternativen
Google SheetsGründe für den Wechsel zu Float
It supports the resource management in the most perfect way- Branche: Umweltdienstleistungen
- Unternehmensgröße: 501–1 000 Mitarbeiter
- Täglich für 1-5 Monate genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Gesamtbewertung
- Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
- Bedienkomfort
- Weiterempfehlungsquote 8.0 /10
Intuitive and helpful software, let down by occasional performance issues
Bewertet am 9.9.2019
Although I list here several cons, I think these are far outweighed by the practical benefits of...
Although I list here several cons, I think these are far outweighed by the practical benefits of using the product, and certainly don’t dampen the experience too much. My experience so far with Float has been one of trying to make it reflect reality, and encourage adoption within our organisation. I think the real advantage of using it will be one project managers are widely aware of its benefits, and proactively use it to resource projects and keep abreast of changes in the availability of our team.
Vorteile
Float is an incredibly intuitive piece of software to use, with a simple calendar-like interface that everyone can understand. I have found that this aspect of the software is helpful in promoting its adoption within our teams. The experience is consistent across the product, which has allowed me to discover more and more features in and enrich the experience of using the product.
Nachteile
The performance of the software is occasionally a bit lacklustre. For example, I often find myself accidentally clicking somewhere on the screen which prompts a dialogue box to open to enter a new task. This problem is especially pronounced when using a trackpad, and isn’t something that I experience elsewhere. Additionally, the interface seems to have a strange way of ‘splitting’ tasks that occur across multiple days. I have found that it often leaves blank gaps that give the illusion that a team member is working more hours per day than they actually are.
There are a few features that I would like to see when going forward. Firstly, I think it would be good if there were different options when ‘resizing’ a task. Currently, the task can be resized independently across both axes (i.e. how many hours per day, and across how many days). I think it would be good if there were an option for these to affect each other – i.e. the total number of hours allocated to the project remains the same and could be allocated fewer hours across more days, or more hours across fewer days.

- Branche: Design
- Unternehmensgröße: 51–200 Mitarbeiter
- Täglich für Mehr als 1 Jahr genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Gesamtbewertung
- Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
- Bedienkomfort
- Kundenbetreuung
- Weiterempfehlungsquote 8.0 /10
Multi disciplinary studio management
Bewertet am 22.1.2019
Currently managing a team of 9 designers in a multi disciplinary team with 30+ different jobs...
Currently managing a team of 9 designers in a multi disciplinary team with 30+ different jobs daily. Tool has worked perfectly well for top line management of workflow and constant changing priorities. Visually easy to understand. Since the recent update the software has performed so much better then expected and has made a massive difference to usability.
Vorteile
The simple usability of the software. How quick it is to add jobs, extend and move jobs around to different people. Flexible scrolling through the weeks. So easy to set someone up and get started with very minimal training. Report system very useful for monthly reports. For top line project management this is the perfect tool.
Nachteile
The search bar sometimes doesnt work or show particular jobs on occasion. Search seems to only work within the month you are viewing, rather then showing a job from a previous month. This is intermittent and sometimes works to find what you are looking for when refreshed. Still need to test this after the software update to see if it has been resolved.
Doesn't refresh for designers, so we have updated and moved jobs around and they aren't aware as their float has remained the same, unless they manually refresh the window.
Would be great to see more in depth project management potential, such as uploading briefs, designs and signing them off all on this software.
- Branche: Medienproduktion
- Unternehmensgröße: 201–500 Mitarbeiter
- Täglich für Mehr als 1 Jahr genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Gesamtbewertung
- Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
- Bedienkomfort
- Kundenbetreuung
- Weiterempfehlungsquote 9.0 /10
Easy to use and efficient time management tool
Bewertet am 16.6.2022
My overall experience with float has been extremely positive. Compared to similar products we've...
My overall experience with float has been extremely positive. Compared to similar products we've used in the past this is the easiest to use, and we have fewer problems than with other software.
Vorteile
Integration with our business was very straightforward, and there are very few problems that arise when using float on the daily. The schedule updates immediately and its very easy to keep track of an entire teams workload at a glance.
Nachteile
Sometimes I have issues adding in new tasks to the system, but this is quite rare.
Antwort von Float
Thanks for your review, Kester! Glad Float was easy to set up for your business and that it's easy to keep track of your team's workload at a glance!
- Branche: Internet
- Unternehmensgröße: 11–50 Mitarbeiter
- Täglich für Mehr als 1 Jahr genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Gesamtbewertung
- Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
- Bedienkomfort
- Weiterempfehlungsquote 10.0 /10
Long terme planning tool
Bewertet am 14.8.2020
Always have a good view on my team's future.
Always have a good view on my team's future.
Vorteile
In a blink of an eye, I can see who's busy on what, and for how long. It let me give a clear idea of planning for upcoming projects, see who's available for it and who's on holiday. Also, it let me check if we take too long to finish a project or not (by setting up a budget forecast).
Nachteile
It would be good to integrate other tools like Yadera or Monday.com. Also, I'd like to have an easier view on days split into different tasks (one per day is really clear, but as soon as you have 2-4 tasks a day, it's harder to read).
- Branche: Informationstechnologie & -dienste
- Unternehmensgröße: 501–1 000 Mitarbeiter
- Wöchentlich für Mehr als 2 Jahre genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Gesamtbewertung
- Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
- Bedienkomfort
- Kundenbetreuung
- Weiterempfehlungsquote 10.0 /10
Float Application - One of the best resource managment tool
Bewertet am 22.8.2023
Overall, it's a time-saver tool for our team in the organization as it centralizes a lot of task...
Overall, it's a time-saver tool for our team in the organization as it centralizes a lot of task with transparency.
Vorteile
One of the things I like best about Float resource management tool is that it allows you to centralize your people and project data. This means that you can easily see the availability, workload, and skills of your team members, as well as the status, budget, and timeline of your projects
Nachteile
A few points on which float needs to work:- It has few API integrations that work- It has limited reporting and forecasting features or maybe I need to look into it myself.
In Betracht gezogene Alternativen
Jira- Branche: Marketing & Werbung
- Unternehmensgröße: 201–500 Mitarbeiter
- Täglich für Mehr als 2 Jahre genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Gesamtbewertung
- Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
- Bedienkomfort
- Kundenbetreuung
- Weiterempfehlungsquote 7.0 /10
A solid system for smaller teams
Bewertet am 22.2.2021
Great system, great team. There is a lot of very good positives for Float, but I can see there is...
Great system, great team. There is a lot of very good positives for Float, but I can see there is still room to grow, but I have no doubt the team at Float will progress this in time.
Vorteile
Float is incredibly easy to use and integrate into smaller teams. Visually straightforward, it gives you quick and simple answers to essential resource-based questions and allows team members to see what work they should be progressing and when in a tidy calendar view. In addition, there is an easy link between time in the calendar to projects that can be managed quickly.
Nachteile
I do find that compared to some other systems, a level of detail when it comes to finances and budgets vs resource is missing. Whilst you can get some very top-level detail, the ability to link actual time spent versus project budgets is a little simplistic and could be expanded upon to really drill down into more detail to provide better overall reports.