--- description: Ausführliche Erfahrungsberichte zu SurveyMonkey Apply mit detaillierten Infos zu Funktionen, Preisen und Bewertungen. Verschaff dir einen schnellen Überblick zu Benutzerfreundlichkeit, Vor- und Nachteilen & vergleiche SurveyMonkey Apply dank GetApp Austria mit ähnlichen Produkten. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/getapp/og_logo-94fd2a03a6c7a0e54fc0c9e21a1c0ce9.png title: SurveyMonkey Apply Erfahrungen, Kosten & Bewertungen | GetApp Österreich 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Startseite](/) > [Fördermittelverwaltung Software](/directory/170/grant-management/software) > [SurveyMonkey Apply](/software/101679/surveymonkey-apply) # SurveyMonkey Apply Canonical: https://www.getapp.at/software/101679/surveymonkey-apply Seite: 1 / 14\ Zurück: [Nächste Seite](https://www.getapp.at/software/101679/surveymonkey-apply?page=2) > SurveyMonkey Apply unterstützt Organisationen bei der Erfassung, Verwaltung und Überprüfung aller Arten von Bewerbungen oder Einreichungen über ein sicheres Online-Portal. > > Bewertung: **4.5/5** von 320 Nutzern. Top bewertet für **Weiterempfehlungsquote**. ----- ## Kurzstatistiken und Ratings | Metrik | Bewertung | Detail | | **Gesamt** | **4.5/5** | 320 Nutzerbewertungen | | Bedienkomfort | 4.4/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Kundenbetreuung | 4.6/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis | 4.3/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Funktionen | 4.4/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Empfehlungsprozentsatz | 80% | (8/10 Weiterempfehlungsquote) | ## Über den Anbieter - **Unternehmen**: Momentive - **Region**: San Mateo, USA - **Gegründet**: 2009 ## Gewerblicher Kontext - **Zielgruppe**: Selbstständig, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1 000, 1 001–5 000, 5 001–10 000, 10 000+ - **Bereitstellungen und Plattformen**: Cloud, SaaS, webbasiert, Android (mobil), iPhone (mobil), iPad (mobil) - **Unterstützte Sprachen**: Englisch, Französisch, Spanisch - **Verfügbare Länder**: Australien, Kanada, Neuseeland, Vereinigte Staaten, Vereinigtes Königreich ## Funktionen - API - Administrative Berichterstattung - Aktivitäts-Dashboard - Aktivitäts-Verfolgung - Alarmfunktion / Benachrichtigungen - Anpassbare Berichte - Anpassbare Felder - Anpassbare Formulare - Anpassbare Fragen - Anwendungsmanagement - Audit Trail - Aufgabenmanagement - Auswirkungsmanagement - Automatisierung von Geschäftsprozessen - Berichterstattung und Statistik - Bewerber-Tracking - Bewerberportal - Bewerter verwalten - Buchhaltung - CRM-Systeme ## Integrationen (3 insgesamt) - PayPal - Stripe - authorize.net ## Optionen für Kundensupport - E-Mail/Helpdesk - Wissensdatenbank - Telefon-Support - Chat ## Category - [Fördermittelverwaltung Software](https://www.getapp.at/directory/170/grant-management/software) ## Ähnliche Kategorien - [Fördermittelverwaltung Software](https://www.getapp.at/directory/170/grant-management/software) - [BPM-Tools](https://www.getapp.at/directory/273/business-process-management-bpm/software) - [Workflow Management Systeme](https://www.getapp.at/directory/566/business-workflow/software) - [Stipendienverwaltungssoftware](https://www.getapp.at/directory/845/scholarship-management/software) - [NPO Software (Non-Profit-Organisationen)](https://www.getapp.at/directory/775/nonprofit/software) ## Alternativen 1. [Givebutter](https://www.getapp.at/software/114523/givebutter) — 4.8/5 (872 reviews) 2. [Donorbox](https://www.getapp.at/software/108833/donorbox) — 4.8/5 (625 reviews) 3. [DonorPerfect](https://www.getapp.at/software/91736/donorperfect-fundraising-software) — 4.5/5 (1436 reviews) 4. [Jotform](https://www.getapp.at/software/10191/jotform-4-0) — 4.7/5 (2895 reviews) 5. [Bloomerang](https://www.getapp.at/software/103573/bloomerang) — 4.7/5 (1287 reviews) ## Nutzerbewertungen ### "Great Product, Great Price, Wonderful Customer Service" — 5.0/5 > **Michael** | *20. August 2018* | Non-Profit-Organisation Management | Empfehlungsbewertung: 9.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: I liked how the implementation specialist was willing to answer all of our questions and work with us on our incredibly complex process to make sure our end product met all of our needs. > > **Nachteile**: There are a few features we wished it had, but we understand our application process is far more complex than most organizations. > > We were able to streamline both our application process as well as the 2 year grant cycle process so it is all in one platform from application through review and then any subsequent reporting requirements of our subgrantees. ----- ### "The best survey software" — 5.0/5 > **Carlos** | *6. Mai 2021* | Bildungsmanagement | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: I love his free version and paid version, like a student and employes who needs make surveys every month i've tried many apps, webs, and software and i totally rather this , it's easy to use and intuitive > > **Nachteile**: Sometimes the template are not necesary, so that should be optional > > It's a great app, you don't need experience to use it ----- ### "SurveyMonkey Apply (SMA, formerly FluidReview) has a Draconian refund policy: No refunds allowed\!" — 2.0/5 > **Frederick** | *31. Juli 2018* > > **Vorteile**: There's really nothing we liked about SMA because we never got as far as being able to use the software for our grants program. During the implementation process, it became clear that there are several significant flaws in the structure of SMA. As an example, SMA/FluidReview was developed for the Canadian market. As such, the organization information form (which cannot be changed) asks for CITY and PROVINCE. There are no fields for the US market such as STATE and ZIP CODE. Yes, you can add custom fields for STATE and ZIP CODE; however, these fields will appear at the end of the form away from the rest of the address information. And adding custom fields does not remove the PROVINCE field. The implementation person we worked with suggested that we ask for a US-style address on our grant application form, thus duplicating data entry. Using work-around solutions (kludges) was the order of the day. As another example, formatting for the budget form that was created for us was chaotic and confusing. Some number fields had one decimal place, others none (and not the two decimal places we were expecting). Some fields had a US dollar symbol; others did not. Again, we were told that SMA/FluidReview was developed with French formatting conventions in mind. Early on we did not see any way SMA would produce an elegant, easy to navigate solution designed for use in the US. It was at this point that we encountered the aforementioned refund policy. > > **Nachteile**: The implementation process did not go smoothly for us. We were asked questions about our current grants program, which is rather simple: we use one web form hosted by Formstack. The implementation person intended to simply replicate our current grants program. This made no sense to me. We were never given the opportunity to understand what features SMA could bring to our grants process. I'm not sure how this type of implementation process would work for a foundation that is just getting started or is using an informal paper-based process. These implementation questions would be overwhelming. The biggest problem with SMA (and other similar grants software packages) is the amount of time and training expected of an administrator. These grants software packages expect that there will be one person within a foundation whose responsibility it is to administer the software. During the implementation process, it became very clear that SMA expects that administrators would devote significant time to not only training but also administrative duties. Sadly, there is no structured training program, no technical manual. So, training would be catch-as-catch can (a video here, an article there). Without someone on the foundation payroll who has a high degree of technology knowledge, SMA would be a very tough go for small foundations with few to no staff. Before you commit to SMA/FluidReview, make sure you have an administrator with a high degree of technological knowledge (and patience). ----- ### "So easy to collect data\!" — 4.0/5 > **Logan** | *17. Dezember 2022* | Non-Profit-Organisation Management | Empfehlungsbewertung: 9.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: I love how many options for different kinds of questions are easily added to surveys > > **Nachteile**: Only 40 responses are able to come per survey ----- ### "Greatest service for surveys\!" — 5.0/5 > **Ina** | *16. Dezember 2022* | Informationstechnologie & -dienste | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: I have always loved giving people the opportunity to provide feedback. With the Survey Monkey Apply software, things feel so easy. I don't have to worry about sending out those long survey links anymore and I don't feel like any of my responses are wasted. It makes for a very fulfilling review process for both the people being surveyed and for me as well\! > > **Nachteile**: We didn't find any cons for SurveyMonkey\!\!\! > > SurveyMonkey Apply has helped us get a clear picture of our customers' thoughts and goals on how to make their lives happier. SurveyMonkey Apply has helped us onboard clients quicker, shorten the time for analysis of surveys for even better decision making\! ----- Seite: 1 / 14\ Zurück: [Nächste Seite](https://www.getapp.at/software/101679/surveymonkey-apply?page=2) ## Links - [Auf GetApp anzeigen](https://www.getapp.at/software/101679/surveymonkey-apply) ## Diese Seite ist in den folgenden Sprachen verfügbar | Sprache | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-MX | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | ----- ## Strukturierte Daten