--- description: Ausführliche Erfahrungsberichte zu Responsive mit detaillierten Infos zu Funktionen, Preisen und Bewertungen. Verschaff dir einen schnellen Überblick zu Benutzerfreundlichkeit, Vor- und Nachteilen & vergleiche Responsive dank GetApp Austria mit ähnlichen Produkten. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/getapp/og_logo-94fd2a03a6c7a0e54fc0c9e21a1c0ce9.png title: Responsive Erfahrungen, Kosten & Bewertungen | GetApp Österreich 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Startseite](/) > [Wissensmanagement Tools](/directory/257/knowledge-management/software) > [Responsive](/software/103221/responsive) # Responsive Canonical: https://www.getapp.at/software/103221/responsive Seite: 1 / 9\ Zurück: [Nächste Seite](https://www.getapp.at/software/103221/responsive?page=2) > Die einfache und intelligente RFP-Software von RFPIO rationalisiert und automatisiert den Antwortprozess, sodass du dich auf das konzentrieren kannst, was am wichtigsten ist. > > Bewertung: **4.5/5** von 190 Nutzern. Top bewertet für **Weiterempfehlungsquote**. ----- ## Kurzstatistiken und Ratings | Metrik | Bewertung | Detail | | **Gesamt** | **4.5/5** | 190 Nutzerbewertungen | | Bedienkomfort | 4.4/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Kundenbetreuung | 4.6/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis | 4.5/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Funktionen | 4.4/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Empfehlungsprozentsatz | 90% | (9/10 Weiterempfehlungsquote) | ## Über den Anbieter - **Unternehmen**: Responsive (formerly RFPIO) - **Region**: Beaverton, USA - **Gegründet**: 2015 ## Gewerblicher Kontext - **Zielgruppe**: 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1 000, 1 001–5 000, 5 001–10 000, 10 000+ - **Bereitstellungen und Plattformen**: Cloud, SaaS, webbasiert - **Unterstützte Sprachen**: Chinesisch, Chinesisch (traditionell), Deutsch, Dänisch, Englisch, Finnisch, Französisch, Griechisch, Italienisch, Japanisch, Koreanisch, Niederländisch, Polnisch, Portugiesisch, Russisch, Schwedisch, Spanisch - **Verfügbare Länder**: Australien, Brasilien, Deutschland, Dänemark, Finnland, Frankreich, Indien, Israel, Kanada, Katar, Kuwait, Luxemburg, Mexiko, Neuseeland, Niederlande, Norwegen, Saudi-Arabien, Schweden, Singapur, Vereinigte Arabische Emirate und 3 weitere ## Funktionen - API - Aktivitäts-Dashboard - Aktivitäts-Verfolgung - Alarmfunktion / Benachrichtigungen - Anforderungsmanagement - Angebotserstellung - Anpassbare Berichte - Anpassbare Vorlagen - Antwort auf Angebotsanfragen - Audit Trail - Aufgaben-Fortschrittsverfolgung - Aufgabenmanagement - Automatische Formatierung - Bedarfsmanagement - Berichterstattung / Analyse - Berichterstattung / Projektverfolgung - Berichterstattung und Statistik - CRM-Systeme - Content-Management - Daten-Import / -Export ## Integrationen (26 insgesamt) - Box - Cisco Duo - Dropbox - Google Chat - Google Drive - Highspot - HubSpot CRM - Jira - Microsoft Azure - Microsoft Excel - Microsoft Outlook - Microsoft PowerPoint - Microsoft SharePoint - Microsoft Teams - Microsoft Word ... und 11 weitere Integrationen ## Optionen für Kundensupport - E-Mail/Helpdesk - FAQ/Forum - Wissensdatenbank - Telefon-Support - 24/7 Live-Support - Chat ## Category - [Wissensmanagement Tools](https://www.getapp.at/directory/257/knowledge-management/software) ## Ähnliche Kategorien - [Wissensmanagement Tools](https://www.getapp.at/directory/257/knowledge-management/software) - [BPM-Tools](https://www.getapp.at/directory/273/business-process-management-bpm/software) - [Angebotsmanagement Software](https://www.getapp.at/directory/340/proposal-management/software) - [Workflow Management Systeme](https://www.getapp.at/directory/566/business-workflow/software) - [Projektmanagement Tools](https://www.getapp.at/directory/332/project-management/software) ## Alternativen 1. [XaitPorter](https://www.getapp.at/software/1665/xaitporter) — 4.7/5 (50 reviews) 2. [Axonaut](https://www.getapp.at/software/132027/axonaut) — 4.5/5 (23 reviews) 3. [PandaDoc](https://www.getapp.at/software/91467/pandadoc) — 4.5/5 (1256 reviews) 4. [Loopio](https://www.getapp.at/software/104297/loopio) — 4.6/5 (74 reviews) 5. [HoneyBook](https://www.getapp.at/software/108739/honeybook) — 4.7/5 (686 reviews) ## Nutzerbewertungen ### "Pros and cons of RFPIO" — 3.0/5 > **Aman Preet** | *20. Dezember 2022* | Biotechnologie | Empfehlungsbewertung: 8.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: RFPIO is the amazing tool for task management as well as for workflow management as we in our team has multiple tasks that are assigned independently to other resources and these tasks can be automatically monitored by team lead.Similarly workflow management helped us to follow the pipeline that we built for each iteration of task. > > **Nachteile**: E-signature feature of this tool is not upto the mark also it don't provide more varieties of docs in customised documents section but we can create different instances of the same using valid methods. > > Overall experience with RFPIO have been quite well as it has fulfilled our current requirements of task management and workflow management. ----- ### "Improving Ease of Use" — 4.0/5 > **Christian** | *24. März 2026* | Krankenhausversorgung & Gesundheitswesen | Empfehlungsbewertung: 8.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: The content library is the most valuable mechanism. It has profoundly improved our RFP answering process and allows us to submit at least two times as many RFPs. > > **Nachteile**: Ease of use could use improvements. I want more hot key customizability to move around the software with fewer clicks and more using keys instead of mouse. Also more of the features should be able to be right clicked and opened in a new window. Also the ribbon in the commenting area should be slidable so that different tabs are next to each other. For example, I want comments, activity, recommendations next to each other as my most used but it's annoying when they are far apart and require multiple clicks to go back and forth between them. > > Overall my experience is great. Made this RFP experience better than any in my past but it still needs a lot of work on ease of use features. ----- ### "RFPIO New to our Organizaion" — 2.0/5 > **Rodney** | *4. April 2024* | Informationstechnologie & -dienste | Empfehlungsbewertung: 2.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: 1. the ability of AI to find response recommendations from previously answered questions 2. the ability to tag or invite someone to assist with a1. particular question 3. the notification email that there are still outstanding questions 4. the team collaboration and what their duties are > > **Nachteile**: 1. Limited view of RFP or the difficulty to reviewing the document 2. Garbage in is garbage out and if there isn't enough responses for a particular question then no data 3. Difficulty of editing, undoing to adding special type functionality 4. Requires automatic save as the solution seemed to consistently delete material and very difficult or impossible to retrieve it. 5. Difficult inserting pictures or cutting and pasting information from other sources. > > Overall I didn't mind using RFPIO, but did feel it had several issues. The last RFP I had I ended up manually saving after every line as I didn't trust that the information would still be there the next time I looked and sure enough, I required my bid leader to find all the information that I typed as it all disappeared. Thankfully I saved all the time so didn't lose much. The AI was getting better as we were increasing the RFP Data base. I am sorry to say though where there are several things I liked about RFPIO,, at this time I would not recommend it as I want more control over the document. ----- ### "Responsive is great\!" — 5.0/5 > **Gabriella** | *7. April 2026* | Personalwesen | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: I like that is very easy to manage my projects and split responsibilities between the people involved. I like that is easy to flag and assign reviwers. Also, I like how easy it is to manage the content library and flag questions. > > **Nachteile**: I would love if it had a "notes" section in each project so everyone could share notes and perceptions about the project. Also, I would love if the review in content library was easier to manage, just as a a project. > > My overall experience is positive, I have total control of my RFPs and of everything that is happening in the projects I am the manager ----- ### "Responsiveness at Its Best." — 5.0/5 > **Anjali** | *27. März 2026* | Finanzdienstleistungen | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: What I like most about Responsive is how it categorizes each product clearly, and how every section has its own owner. This makes it very easy to understand which business unit to reach out to. > > **Nachteile**: The aspect I find least favorable is that when exporting to Excel or Word, the formatting often becomes inconsistent despite selecting a specific font. > > My overall experience with Responsive has been quite positive. The platform stands out for its clear structure and organization—each product is categorized neatly, and every section has a designated owner, which makes it easy to know exactly who to reach out to within different business units. That clarity really streamlines communication and reduces confusion. ----- Seite: 1 / 9\ Zurück: [Nächste Seite](https://www.getapp.at/software/103221/responsive?page=2) ## Links - [Auf GetApp anzeigen](https://www.getapp.at/software/103221/responsive) ## Diese Seite ist in den folgenden Sprachen verfügbar | Sprache | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-MX | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | ----- ## Strukturierte Daten