--- description: Ausführliche Erfahrungsberichte zu BrowserStack mit detaillierten Infos zu Funktionen, Preisen und Bewertungen. Verschaff dir einen schnellen Überblick zu Benutzerfreundlichkeit, Vor- und Nachteilen & vergleiche BrowserStack dank GetApp Austria mit ähnlichen Produkten. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/getapp/og_logo-94fd2a03a6c7a0e54fc0c9e21a1c0ce9.png title: BrowserStack Erfahrungen, Kosten & Bewertungen | GetApp Österreich 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Startseite](/) > [Bugtracker](/directory/1003/bug-tracking/software) > [BrowserStack](/software/170655/browserstack) # BrowserStack Canonical: https://www.getapp.at/software/170655/browserstack Seite: 1 / 32\ Zurück: [Nächste Seite](https://www.getapp.at/software/170655/browserstack?page=2) > BrowserStack ist eine browserübergreifende Testplattform, mit der Entwickler Tools integrieren können, um automatisierte, visuelle und Live-Tests über mobile Anwendungen und Websites hinweg durchzuführen. DevOps-Teams können auch lokale Tests für WIP-Anwendungen (Work in Progress) durchführen, ohne sie in öffentlichen Umgebungen zu hosten. > > Bewertung: **4.6/5** von 774 Nutzern. Top bewertet für **Weiterempfehlungsquote**. ----- ## Kurzstatistiken und Ratings | Metrik | Bewertung | Detail | | **Gesamt** | **4.6/5** | 774 Nutzerbewertungen | | Bedienkomfort | 4.6/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Kundenbetreuung | 4.4/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis | 4.2/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Funktionen | 4.5/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Empfehlungsprozentsatz | 90% | (9/10 Weiterempfehlungsquote) | ## Über den Anbieter - **Unternehmen**: BrowserStack - **Gegründet**: 2011 ## Gewerblicher Kontext - **Startpreis**: $ 39,00 - **Preismodell**: (Kostenlose Version verfügbar) (Gratis Testen) - **Zielgruppe**: Selbstständig, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1 000, 1 001–5 000, 5 001–10 000, 10 000+ - **Bereitstellungen und Plattformen**: Cloud, SaaS, webbasiert, Mac (Desktop), Windows (Desktop) - **Unterstützte Sprachen**: Englisch - **Verfügbare Länder**: Amerikanische Jungferninseln, Australien, Brasilien, Britische Jungferninseln, Deutschland, Dänemark, Indien, Irland, Israel, Kanada, Mexiko, Singapur, Südafrika, Vereinigte Arabische Emirate, Vereinigte Staaten, Vereinigtes Königreich ## Funktionen - A/B Testing - API - Aktivitäts-Dashboard - Aktivitäts-Verfolgung - Aktivitätsüberwachung - Alarmfunktion / Benachrichtigungen - Alerts/Escalation - Anforderungsbasiertes Testen - Anforderungsmanagement - Anmerkungen - Anomalieerkennung - Anpassbare Berichte - Anpassbare Felder - Anpassbare Fragen - Anpassbare Kategorien - Anpassbare Vorlagen - Archivierung & Aufbewahrung - Audit Trail - Aufgabenmanagement - Automated Testing ## Integrationen (16 insgesamt) - Appium - Bitbucket - CircleCI - Cypress - Espresso - GitHub - Jenkins - Jira - Microsoft Visual Studio - Netlify - Slack - Travis CI - Trello - Tricentis qTest - WordPress ... und 1 weitere Integrationen ## Optionen für Kundensupport - E-Mail/Helpdesk - FAQ/Forum - Wissensdatenbank - Telefon-Support - Chat ## Category - [Bugtracker](https://www.getapp.at/directory/1003/bug-tracking/software) ## Ähnliche Kategorien - [Bugtracker](https://www.getapp.at/directory/1003/bug-tracking/software) - [Lasttest-Tools](https://www.getapp.at/directory/1959/load-testing/software) - [User Testing Software](https://www.getapp.at/directory/2075/user-testing/software) - [Testmanagement-Tools](https://www.getapp.at/directory/3879/test-management-tools/software) - [Prüfsoftware](https://www.getapp.at/directory/389/testing/software) ## Alternativen 1. [TestRail](https://www.getapp.at/software/112767/testrail) — 4.3/5 (179 reviews) 2. [Testsigma](https://www.getapp.at/software/116987/testsigma) — 4.3/5 (19 reviews) 3. [Userlytics](https://www.getapp.at/software/121415/userlytics) — 4.7/5 (55 reviews) 4. [Userbrain](https://www.getapp.at/software/130543/userbrain) — 4.2/5 (88 reviews) 5. [Hotjar](https://www.getapp.at/software/101789/hotjar) — 4.6/5 (543 reviews) ## Nutzerbewertungen ### "Good tool for cross browser testing with real devices" — 4.0/5 > **Logesh** | *3. April 2026* | Informationstechnologie & -dienste | Empfehlungsbewertung: 8.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: The best part about BrowserStack is that you can access real devices and various browser versions without needing to maintain any physical setup. This makes it easier to test across different environments quickly. The UI is simple and easy to navigate. The live testing feature is useful for quick validations and debugging. > > **Nachteile**: Sometimes the sessions feel slow or laggy, especially when switching between devices. The pricing can also be a bit high for smaller teams or individual users. > > Overall, my experience with BrowserStack has been positive. As a QA engineer, I mainly use it for cross-browser and responsive testing. It saves a lot of time compared to setting up local environments or using actual devices. I have used it to test UI issues and browser compatibility across various platforms. While there is some room for improvement in its performance, it remains a reliable tool for my daily testing needs. ----- ### "Reliable and Easy-to-Use Testing Platform" — 5.0/5 > **Bhargavi** | *17. November 2025* | Computer-Software | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: BrowserStack makes cross-browser and cross-device testing extremely easy. I can instantly test on real devices without needing to maintain any setup. The interface is very user-friendly, and the performance is fast and reliable. It also supports a wide variety of browsers and OS combinations, which helps a lot in QA. > > **Nachteile**: Sometimes the session takes a few seconds to load, especially on mobile devices. A few older device configurations are slow or laggy. The pricing is also a bit high for small teams. Apart from that, everything works well. > > Overall, my experience with BrowserStack has been very positive. It has helped save a lot of time in testing by giving instant access to real devices and browsers. The platform is stable, easy to use, and perfect for ensuring quality across multiple environments. It has become an essential tool in my workflow. ----- ### "Focus on Future Nitche" — 3.0/5 > **Acharaj** | *1. April 2026* | Informationsdienst | Empfehlungsbewertung: 7.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: Its Test Bed capacities Its Evaluation Matrix Improvisation (which is not live yet) All in one solution > > **Nachteile**: Self Healing Feature is still not up to the mark Prompt Design Engg \& Self Feedback Looping- You should be focusing on this more. This is the backbone of AI generated tests. Less competitive as compare to their nitche players > > Good, but i think product should be taking a deep review of the other good players in market like TestIM, Promptfoo.com for different features. From there they can get some references \& get good features implemented. ----- ### "BrowserStack: What Works and What Doesn’t" — 4.0/5 > **Rohit** | *2. April 2026* | Informationstechnologie & -dienste | Empfehlungsbewertung: 7.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: Easy integration with most of automation framework Cross browser and cross platform testing No headache of setting up infrastructure Parallel testing functionality saves time Live testing, testing with real devices, local testing features Easy debugging using video recording, screenshot and logs > > **Nachteile**: Only things that can bother Costly for small projects or teams Performance and latency issues due to cloud based Sometimes session timeouts and stability issues may pop up due to which you'll get flaky test results Initial setup may takes time for newbie > > It's positive overall, Iused it for cross-browser testing, integrated with Selenium/Playwright for automation, and leveraged parallel execution to speed up regression. While there are some challenges like cost and occasional latency but that's how almost every platforms have some limitations ----- ### "Everything under a single umbrella\!" — 5.0/5 > **Sarav** | *7. April 2026* | Finanzdienstleistungen | Empfehlungsbewertung: 8.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: it offers a variety of features from mobile devices to test, manage reports and integration with tools like jira and CI/CD pipelines > > **Nachteile**: Connectivity issues while performing Device testing. This is not all the time, however, i do face this issue from time to time. > > Overall a great SaaS application which makes life easy since it offers all major featureslike tools to ttest, report and integration with other apps. All in one\! ----- Seite: 1 / 32\ Zurück: [Nächste Seite](https://www.getapp.at/software/170655/browserstack?page=2) ## Links - [Auf GetApp anzeigen](https://www.getapp.at/software/170655/browserstack) ## Diese Seite ist in den folgenden Sprachen verfügbar | Sprache | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-MX | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | ----- ## Strukturierte Daten