--- description: Ausführliche Erfahrungsberichte zu BrowserStack mit detaillierten Infos zu Funktionen, Preisen und Bewertungen. Verschaff dir einen schnellen Überblick zu Benutzerfreundlichkeit, Vor- und Nachteilen & vergleiche BrowserStack dank GetApp Austria mit ähnlichen Produkten. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/getapp/og_logo-94fd2a03a6c7a0e54fc0c9e21a1c0ce9.png title: BrowserStack Erfahrungen, Kosten & Bewertungen | GetApp Österreich 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Startseite](/) > [Bugtracker](/directory/1003/bug-tracking/software) > [BrowserStack](/software/170655/browserstack) # BrowserStack Canonical: https://www.getapp.at/software/170655/browserstack Page: 1 / 25\ Zurück: [Next page](https://www.getapp.at/software/170655/browserstack?page=2) > BrowserStack ist eine browserübergreifende Testplattform, mit der Entwickler Tools integrieren können, um automatisierte, visuelle und Live-Tests über mobile Anwendungen und Websites hinweg durchzuführen. DevOps-Teams können auch lokale Tests für WIP-Anwendungen (Work in Progress) durchführen, ohne sie in öffentlichen Umgebungen zu hosten. > > Verdict: Rated **4.6/5** by 602 users. Top-rated for **Weiterempfehlungsquote**. ----- ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Bewertung | Detail | | **Gesamt** | **4.6/5** | 602 Nutzerbewertungen | | Bedienkomfort | 4.6/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Kundenbetreuung | 4.4/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis | 4.2/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Funktionen | 4.5/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 90% | (9/10 Weiterempfehlungsquote) | ## Über den Anbieter - **Unternehmen**: BrowserStack - **Founded**: 2011 ## Commercial Context - **Startpreis**: $ 39,00 - **Preismodell**: (Free version available) (Gratis Testen) - **Target Audience**: Selbstständig, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1 000, 1 001–5 000 - **Deployment & Platforms**: Cloud, SaaS, webbasiert, Mac (Desktop), Windows (Desktop) - **Unterstützte Sprachen**: Englisch - **Available Countries**: Amerikanische Jungferninseln, Australien, Brasilien, Britische Jungferninseln, Deutschland, Dänemark, Indien, Irland, Israel, Kanada, Mexiko, Singapur, Südafrika, Vereinigte Arabische Emirate, Vereinigte Staaten, Vereinigtes Königreich ## Funktionen - A/B Testing - API - Aktivitäts-Dashboard - Aktivitäts-Verfolgung - Aktivitätsüberwachung - Alarmfunktion / Benachrichtigungen - Alerts/Escalation - Anforderungsbasiertes Testen - Anforderungsmanagement - Anmerkungen - Anomalieerkennung - Anpassbare Berichte - Anpassbare Felder - Anpassbare Fragen - Anpassbare Kategorien - Anpassbare Vorlagen - Archivierung & Aufbewahrung - Audit Trail - Aufgabenmanagement - Automated Testing ## Integrations (16 total) - Appium - Bitbucket - CircleCI - Cypress - Espresso - GitHub - Jenkins - Jira - Microsoft Visual Studio - Netlify - Slack - Travis CI - Trello - Tricentis qTest - WordPress ... and 1 more integrations ## Optionen für Kundensupport - E-Mail/Helpdesk - FAQ/Forum - Wissensdatenbank - Telefon-Support - Chat ## Category - [Bugtracker](https://www.getapp.at/directory/1003/bug-tracking/software) ## Ähnliche Kategorien - [Bugtracker](https://www.getapp.at/directory/1003/bug-tracking/software) - [Lasttest-Tools](https://www.getapp.at/directory/1959/load-testing/software) - [User Testing Software](https://www.getapp.at/directory/2075/user-testing/software) - [Testmanagement-Tools](https://www.getapp.at/directory/3879/test-management-tools/software) - [Prüfsoftware](https://www.getapp.at/directory/389/testing/software) ## Alternativen 1. [TestRail](https://www.getapp.at/software/112767/testrail) — 4.3/5 (176 reviews) 2. [Userlytics](https://www.getapp.at/software/121415/userlytics) — 4.7/5 (55 reviews) 3. [Userbrain](https://www.getapp.at/software/130543/userbrain) — 4.2/5 (88 reviews) 4. [Testsigma](https://www.getapp.at/software/116987/testsigma) — 4.3/5 (19 reviews) 5. [Hotjar](https://www.getapp.at/software/101789/hotjar) — 4.6/5 (539 reviews) ## Nutzerbewertungen ### "Affordable app with a wide range of tools." — 5.0/5 > **Yanina** | *2. September 2024* | Computer-Software | Recommendation rating: 9.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: Browserstack is affordable for a single user – that's the main reason I chose it. As the only user in the team, I was looking for a tool that allows me to keep my documentation organised and offers an affordable plan. > > **Nachteile**: I'm a new user – haven't found any cons yet. > > Browserstack is easy to use, comfortable to start and has the functionality I need in my work. ----- ### "BrowserStack Test Management - a strong new player\!" — 5.0/5 > **Anonymous User** | *13. Juni 2025* | Versicherung | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: BrowserStack Test Management allows easy formatting of test cases, supporting almost full Markdown formatting. The user interface is very intuitive and moving over from other major Test Management competitors was super easy - the quick import process was pretty much flawless, mapping all the information to the proper fields and keeping the general formatting of test cases and even images within steps. > > **Nachteile**: The reporting is a bit limited, but the product is still somewhat new, so it should improve with time. We'd like to see a view (or report) showing number of test cases per status so we can figure out where we need to work (too many draft test cases or many test cases needing review, etc.) The plan with AI component to help test case design and writing ends up being a bit expensive. > > We use the Test Management software from BrowserStack to replace the old standby Testrail. BrowserStack is pretty great and we didn't feel there was much missing compared to more established players. The AI functionality was pretty sensational to come up with test cases and then to help write actual steps. If you haven't used a proper Test Case management software (ones were test cases are test cases and not tickets in JIRA, for example), give BrowserStack a try - there is even a free tier you can use\! ----- ### "Comprehensive Real-Device Testing, Though a Bit Pricey" — 3.0/5 > **Amrut** | *25. November 2025* | Bankwesen | Recommendation rating: 5.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: Massive Real Device Cloud: Access to thousands of real iOS and Android devices (not just emulators) is the biggest selling point. It makes debugging specific device-related issues very reliable. Ease of Integration: It integrates seamlessly with our existing automation frameworks (Selenium, Cypress, Playwright) and CI/CD pipelines (Jenkins/GitHub Actions). Local Testing: The ability to test internal staging and development environments securely using the Local Testing binary is incredibly useful. UI/UX: The interface is intuitive. Switching between devices, orientations, and capturing logs/screenshots during a live session is very smooth. > > **Nachteile**: Cost: It is significantly more expensive than some competitors. For small startups or individual developers, the pricing tiers can be a barrier. Latency: During "Live" (manual) testing, there is occasionally noticeable input lag, especially when interacting with complex animations or heavy web apps on older mobile devices. Queuing: On very popular device/OS combinations (like the latest iPhone release), you sometimes hit a queue and have to wait a few minutes for a device to become available. > > regarding Value for Money, it is a premium tool. While it replaces the need for an internal device lab (which is a huge headache to manage), the subscription costs add up quickly if you need many parallel threads. ----- ### "Great Value for Mobile App Testing and Automation" — 5.0/5 > **Divyang** | *27. November 2025* | Computer-Software | Recommendation rating: 9.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: BrowserStack has been extremely reliable for our mobile automation workflows. The availability of real Android and iOS devices helps us validate UI, performance, and network behavior exactly as it would appear to end users. Integration with CI/CD tools like Jenkins and GitHub Actions is seamless, allowing us to trigger automated test runs on every build without maintaining our own device lab. The platform is fast, stable, and provides detailed logs, screenshots, and video recordings that make debugging much easier. Their support team is also responsive whenever we need help with configuration or device-specific issues. Customer support is too good and I really impressed with it. > > **Nachteile**: Some high-demand devices get queued during peak hours, which can delay runs. Network-based tests sometimes require manual configuration, and setting up BrowserStackLocal for secure environments could be smoother, especially when running multiple parallel tunnels. Pricing can also feel slightly high for small teams, but the value justifies it. > > My overall experience has been excellent. BrowserStack has significantly reduced our testing overhead by eliminating the need to maintain physical devices. Our mobile automation suite runs consistently across OS versions, screen resolutions, and device manufacturers. Debugging has become quicker thanks to screenshots, logs, and session recordings. It has helped us improve QA coverage, speed up releases, and deliver a more stable mobile product. I would definitely recommend BrowserStack to teams looking for reliable cloud-based mobile testing infrastructure. ----- ### "BrowserStack is Overall good but need some upgrade" — 4.0/5 > **Verifizierter Rezensent** | *20. Februar 2025* | Computer-Software | Recommendation rating: 7.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: Web live and App Live most like from this. Also App live its good for open any new devices like iphone and Android > > **Nachteile**: Not able to open last opened device . Also not able to open setting menu for phone when we using app live > > I am using BS more than 3 to 4 yrs. Most of Using app and web live Less use of Accessibility and Web Inspector ----- Page: 1 / 25\ Zurück: [Next page](https://www.getapp.at/software/170655/browserstack?page=2) ## Links - [View on GetApp](https://www.getapp.at/software/170655/browserstack) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-MX | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | ----- ## Structured Data